OU Home
|
OU Libraries' Home
Apply
|
Campus Links
|
Libraries
OU
OUNetID
Password
Hours
About Us
Welcome
Announcements
Giving to OU Libraries
Employees
Employment
Exhibits
Conferences
OU Libraries Facts
Our Mission
About the Website
Resources
Catalog
Databases &
E-Reference Materials
Digital Collections
E-Journals
E-Reserves
Find Articles
Guides
Resources by Subject
Sooner Heritage
Textbooks
Services
All Services
For Faculty & Staff
For Graduate Students
For Undergraduate Students
For Distance Education
For Visitors
For Patrons with Disabilities
Locations
Bizzell Memorial
Library (Main)
Acquisitions
Administration
Cataloging & Metadata
Circulation
Collection
Development
Current Periodicals
Digitizing & Copying Center
Government Documents
Interlibrary Loan
Reference
Reserves
Library Service Platforms
Other OU Units
Branch Libraries
Architecture Library
Engineering Library
Fine Arts Library
Physics & Astronomy Library
Youngblood Energy Library (Geology)
Special Collections
Bass Business Collection
Bizzell Bible Collection
History of Science
Nichols Collection
Western History Collections
Other Libraries
Bird Library (OUHSC)
Schusterman Library (Tulsa)
Pray Library (Law)
Help
Ask Us
Knowledge Base
Maps
Site Search
Technical Assistance
Tutorials
Follow Us...
Ask Us
Chat requires JavaScript.
Initiatives
Previous Exhibits of
Books that Inspire
Books That Inspire 2005
Chaos: Making of a New Science
James Gleick
More by This Author
As an undergraduate physics major in 1971 I remember clearly the announcement of a new course “History of Physics” and my response “Why should I take a course on the past, on ‘old’ physics? I’m only interested in new ideas.” I recall this clearly because of its youthful arrogance, and because my career fortunately did not follow an equally narrow-minded path. New ideas can be best developed through appreciation of how current theories themselves were at one time new and had to contend with entrenched ‘truths’. Still, the process by which fundamentally new theories evolved always seemed maddeningly incoherent and therefore uncomfortable to my scientific mind.
When I first read this book by James Gleick in 1987 I had an Ah Ha! moment, as he suddenly brought sense and reasonableness to the process. An eminently readable book, it shows research to be a very human process, full of characters, ideas, conflicts, egos, happy coincidences, the search for truth, and blind alleys. The characters are compelling – one protagonist’s behavior “bordered on strange, even for the Theoretical Division.” Strange concepts such as “bounded randomness” become clear. Chaos theory originated simultaneously in several disciplines, and the author points out that this itself helped the theory as it forced the researchers to step outside their own disciplines’ comfortable constraints. Although Chaos is no longer a ‘new’ idea, the book is still a good read for scientists and non-scientists alike.
Lee Williams
Vice-President, Research
Dean
Graduate College